Rss Feed
Tweeter button
Facebook button
Technorati button
Myspace button
Webonews button
Delicious button
Digg button
Flickr button

Learning curve


28
Mar 09

The look of low-fi

Back in Art School Round 1, I used to struggle a bit with photography. My old Nikkormat FT2, given to me by my father, was a Good Camera (and I hope whoever bought it off the crim who stole it from my Queens apartment in 1993 appreciated it).

I took a few good pictures here and there, but I wasn’t a good enough (or diligent enough) photographer to get consistently Good Pictures out of it. In fact, most of the photos I loved best were the happy accidents: blurry or malcoloured or in some way ‘wrong’. (There’s nothing like a roll of slide film processed like colour negatives!)

And I still love Bad Pictures (see here). Not that I have anything against good photographers. Some of my best friends are good photographers. But I’m never going to be one of them.

So last week, inspired by a recent DIY photo workshop at the Adelaide Fringe, I took another step away from the tyranny of the Good Camera: I bought a “cheap” Diana. (I know, I could have made a pinhole camera, but I’m lazy.) The hardest thing about using it is waiting a week to get my negs back from the photo shop!

The first film I ran through it was some old T-Max given to me by a photo editor at Rolling Stone (which should give a clue as to how frick’n old it is). And it was outdated when she gave it to me, tho only just. And just to ensure I couldn’t shoot any Good Pictures on it, I loaded it in ordinary daylight, forgot to set the focal distance accordingly, underexposed it, held the shutter open kind of indiscriminately, and asked the shop to push the developing.

You know what, I’m thrilled with it! It vignettes so prettily. And it does nice things to boring old 35mm film too. I can’t wait to try out the pinhole setting.

I am, by the way, obsessed with drawing, painting and photographing my largely unimproved 1950s backyard, especially my clothesline. Expect more along these lines. And if anyone reading has any outdated film of any kind that they would like to donate, please sing out! I’m sure we can come up with some kind of swap.


24
Mar 09

Getting my hands dirty

I believe the word is ‘recidivist’? Yep, I’m back at art school. On again, off again.

Specifically, I’m right off the overly thinky stuff in the master’s program. What I really wanted was to get my hands dirty—make art, not talk about it so much. So I’m in TAFE, in the BA. And at the rate I’m going, it could well take me five years to complete the degree I didn’t finish in the late 80s. But whatever. I’m doing art again. I’m happy.

This term, it’s figure drawing. Doesn’t look like great shakes, but it’s a world apart from the drawing I used to do when I was in art school round 1 (when I was ostensibly more on top of my game than I am now). I don’t know if I see things differently now, but one thing’s sure—I’m not so a’skeered of making a mess.

smudgy!


11
Feb 09

Adaptation starts now

There’s so much I want to say about the Victorian bushfires this week. Much of it, for me, goes back to what I was writing when SA had its heatwave—that we all need to stop talking about making changes to our lifestyles, and start making them: “If this is the way is is going to be, our choice is to leave, or to adapt.”

And by “we” and “all” I mean not just Australians. Folks down here haven’t made the climate change by itself. My feeling for a long time has been that Australia is the canary in the world’s coalmine, and I recently learned that there’s reason to feel this way: “Australia has been identified in a number of studies…[as] the developed country most at risk from the adverse impacts of climate change.” (Dr David Karoly on Lateline, 10 Feb, read full transcript here.)

Tragedy seems to nuture community spirit—it certainly has in this case. You get the feeling that all Australia is wanting and trying to help. (Some flooded-out Queenslanders are even asking that their relief payments go to Victoria; that’s pretty inspiring.) I hope that we can draw on that kind of spirit to make the changes we need to make. I hope we can set an example for others too.


18
Sep 08

Getting political

I made a contribution to a political campaign today for the first time ever. I’m a registered Republican (and remember, you’ve gotta be registered in order to vote in the US, and most Americans must choose a party affiliation to participate in the primary elections) who’s really too apolitical to worry about what the card says. Maybe you’d call me an independent Republican. I’ve always voted Democrat in the federal elections. I even held my nose and voted for John Kerry. (I knew I was just cancelling out my grandmother’s vote, really — she got up off her deathbed to vote Republican, and I made a last-minute dash to ensure my overseas postal vote got in on time.)

But until today, I was on the fence. Until today, I didn’t know anything about Sarah Palin. Now I know. And it galvanised me (like a taser, really) to leap off the fence, and throw some money at Barack Obama at the same time. He needs more than just quiet goodwill and votes if anything is ever going to get better in my poor beleaguered motherland.

I remember feeling when Gore lost Bush seized control of the White House that we’d entered some kind of parallel dimension. It doesn’t seem to have gotten much better since then, and if the Republicans continue on in this completely misanthropic way, it’s not going to get any better. (Where is Dr Who when you really need him?)

I realise the Veep post is largely symbolic. I realise we survived four years of Dan Quayle. But I’m not sure we can survive four years of “if another country [Georgia] is attacked you’re going to be expected to be called upon to help”.

I’m absolutely over the Republican right speaking for everyone. I considered changing my registration, even. But no. Let it stand: Republicans for Obama.

Edited to answer Katie’s question: what was it that tipped me over the edge?

Simply put, an accumulation of detail. In the reading I’ve done, a picture has emerged of Sarah Palin as the kind of conservative right-winger who’s taken over the Republican party.

But let’s back up. I had hoped, against hope I suppose, that when Bush took office he would recognise not just his own limitations ha ha but also the fact that as powerful as the President is, he is also only as good as the people he chooses to surround him. Bush’s choices revealed the Republican agenda pretty clearly, no?

David Gelernter, whose writing I admire, has made an eloquent case for Americanism, a civic religion in which people believe in “liberty, equality, and democracy for all [hu]mankind”, regardless of—or in concert with—their own personal religions.

After September 11, the Republican party was in a position to revive this civic religion. I think people were starved for it. Instead, well, you know how the story has gone. The country has become more and more inward looking, belligerent, insular, and narrow-minded. And fearful.

As it loses power to growing nations like China and India, the US will have to find a new place in the world. And while Gelernter worries that the Democratic left wants to achieve the goals of Americanism via Euro-lefty global appeasement and pacificism (the sort that the French tried out in WW2, and look how far that got them), I worry far less eloquently but just as much about the Republican method of shoving it down people’s throats.

I felt McCain was capable of being centrist, of reaching out to liberals, moderates, conservatives. Of getting into office without pandering to the Republican right-wing fundies who would really like to shove their values down other people’s throats, both at home and abroad. Then he chose Sarah Palin as his running mate, and I needed to take some time to see what was what.

And now I see that McCain has done a Bush. By choosing Sarah Palin for a position of power and visibility in America, and thus around the world, McCain has shown what kind of people he will surround himself with as president (and also what kind of cynical, misanthropic advisers he’s surrounded by now). And I’m not voting for that kind of presidency.


9
Jul 08

I’ve been bamboozled!

I always loved the way Richard Hatch bowed out of the Survivor All-Star series, almost gleefully announcing, “I’ve been bamboozled!”

Me too! Been bamboozled by a knitting pattern! After all this time, all that yarn under the bridge, you’d think I’d know better. Nup. I’ve definitely lost the battle with this wrap (far right) by Tom Scott, who says he likes to think about the women he’s designing for.

Wonder what does he think when he’s designing? (That bag lady I passed on the way to the studio—so inspiring!)

The little number I knitted was very tempting, but I should have known better. The reverse stocking stitch sans selvedge. The way the sample clings to the model yet the pattern completely lacks shaping—clothespegs up the back, anyone? And the back waist, well, the less said about that the better. (Tommy, baby, you lied to me!)

What was I thinking, carrying on this long with it? I dunno. I’ve got to be a bit compulsive about finishing projects before I start new ones. Wanted to polish it off and have a stylin’ new sweater for me this winter. Not to be. Must get on knitting husband and child garments before the weather warms up.


25
Jun 08

Lookie, lookie, ice cream cookie

As my favourite maths teacher used to say. Dunno why. But I *did* finally start to get maths in his class.

I digress. Already! I’m just here to mention a site overhaul. I’ve been tinkering, messing around, swearing a lot, begging for tips & tlc from web-oriented friends (you know who you are), and I’m pretty pleased with how it’s looking. What do you think?

Also, here’s the sketchbook page: chili! (One of my favourite things to cook, evah. Mainly because I could do it in my sleep.)


27
May 08

Closing books, opening doors

Remember my cup running over a few weeks ago? Well, I spoke too soon, I guess.

The knitting book project I had hoped to be editing has been back-burnered by the publisher. Their loss, I say. The designer is already bouncing back (as she does) with bright new ideas, so I don’t think the knitting community will suffer this loss. There will be more from that quarter.

For me, the bright side is that after years of work always steering me away from art, life seems finally to be steering me back. Onward…


10
May 08

Mothers, and their mothers

Getting rid of stuff in the house where I grew up was a funny thing. We were four women, three generations, living in a largeish house with ample storage space, but there was never enough room for stuff. We were always needing to make more room for new stuff.

Of stuff, there was ‘your stuff’, ‘my stuff’ and some loosely communal stuff, which often had a known owner but was always in circulation. Jewelry was communal stuff, Barbie clothes (though not Barbies) were communal stuff, and some items of clothing were communal too, like certain sweaters, LL Bean hunting boots and a ski jacket which still bore the remnant of a pink 1965 Sun Valley lift ticket on its left hood string and was only ever worn for going outside to feed the dog.

My grandmother was well-known (and feared) for throwing away other people’s stuff to make room for her stuff. (From my stuff two things went missing which I still mourn: a friend’s great-grandfather’s WW1 pilot’s jacket—which had a hideous hole in the elbow but was still beautiful and, more to the point, not mine to throw away—and a photocopied lyric sheet from a 10,000 Maniacs album which had been drawn on and autographed by Natalie Merchant herself.)

The rest of us had a few choices: you could give your stuff away, throw it away, or foist it on someone else in the house, and if you were me, usually it was the latter. This meant it was no longer my stuff but it was still close by, and yet I had room for more more stuff. Brilliant!

Books, too, were communal, more or less. They sort of belonged to the house, which had large built-in-shelves covering a living room wall. A lot of the books had come with the house, like classics, old textbooks, and oddities including a whole set of World Books from the 1950s, beautifully typeset in Futura and woefully outdated (though this did not stop my sister or me from referencing them for school reports and probably explains a lot about my teenage worldview).

We were all good readers and the house library did get used. Like a lot of people, my grandmother became a compulsive reader of mysteries and crime novels, and she also would re-read a favourite classic from time to time. These would often be bookmarked with Kleenex, or with an old, folded magazine subscription blow-in card (one of those mailback postcards that snow out of an American magazine the minute you pick it up).

On my last visit home, in 2005 for Gram’s memorial service, I spent two weeks in the house with my mom and my daughter (still three generations, just one woman down, since my sister was living in the UK and was too pregnant to travel). I enjoyed this time at my home in its everyday state, knowing it would be the last time I could be home. I enjoyed walking around outside, visiting with some high school friends, seeing lots of cousins, and I spent a lot of time sorting out ‘my stuff’, which had dwindled over the years, subject to my periodic culling as well as my grandmother’s and later my mother’s.

I wanted to take the whole house back to Australia with me, just fold it down like closing a pop-up book, and take it all away with me, because it contained so much of my memory in it—stuff I’m foisting on you now—but in the end I had to be realistic.

I recognised my useless stuff for what it was and threw it out. The things I could not bear to chuck out (a couple of LPs, Barbie clothes which were communal and could not legally travel home with me, some books) I foisted on my mother. And I had collected new stuff which I needed to make room for in my suitcase: a small stuffed animal for my daughter, a marble game for my son, two duck prints for my husband—note none of them seems to particularly like or appreciate these things but oh well—plus a large teapot, a copper jelly mould, four pretty rice bowls, a little Portuguese cream jug, and a book for me.

The book was a funny thing. The Importance of Living, by Lin Yutang (fourteenth printing, 1938), was tucked onto (another) bookshelf in the den, where my grandmother’s stuff had piled up due to the time she spent there watching TV, reading, napping, having meals—so although it wasn’t something I would have expected her to read, I I knew she must have been reading it (and the subscription-card bookmark inside was a giveaway). But the endpaper bears a sticker with my great-grandmother’s name and address in it so I don’t know who was pencilling lines under certain passages and folding down the odd page.

I picked the book up again recently (admittedly to use as a prop in a photo shoot) and in flicking through it and noting the particular marked phrases, realised again that I have a treasure on my hands here. The book itself, and also, the book as a window into the minds of two women who’ve shaped me just by virtue of being alive, passing along their thoughts, their ways of doing things, handing them along through generations (for better or for worse). Here’s a bit that helps explain what I mean, and why I might want to blog about it anyway:

“There is a method of appealing to one’s own intuitive judgment, of thinking out one’s own ideas and forming one’s own independent judgments, and confessing them in public with a childish impudence, and sure enough, some kindred souls in another corner of the world will agree with you. A person forming his ideas in this manner will often be astounded to discover how another writer said exactly the same things and felt exactly the same way, but perhaps expressed the ideas more easily and more gracefully. It is then that he discovers the ancient author and the ancient author bears him witness, and they become forever friends in spirit.”

Good stuff. Stuff to keep.


5
May 08

My cup (and my rubbish bin) runneth over

I have a rubbish bin full of tissues that needs emptying, and I had two job offers last week. I’m still pinching myself over that. I haven’t had a job offer in, like, forever, because in Adelaide, job offers don’t happen to normal people. Well, maybe that do, but they don’t to me. (Maybe I’m not normal.)

One was a communications job in an arts and crafts capacity, the other a long-term project editing a knitting book for a designer. And I had to pick ONE.

It wasn’t an easy, relaxed weekend. I sneezed a lot, moped around and also whinged at length to husband and to a very wise friend who pointed out: ‘You’re always sick.’

I started to say, Now, I’m sure I’m not always sick, but because she’s one of those people who is usually right, I stopped to think about whether I am always sick. I do tend to talk to her a lot more in times of stress, and come to think of it, I’m usually sick at those times. Do I get sick because I’m stressed, or does stress prey on illness? I’m pretty sure it’s a downward spiral.

Anyway, I have been sick a lot in the last few years. I stay up too late trying to have free time because I chase after family and work all the rest of the time. Something has got to make way for me.

So I have just said no to the communications job. I was almost twisting my own arm to force myself to do it, but I did it. The book job it is. Which scares the beejeezus out of me, but in a good way. It will fit in amongst other freelance jobs and allow me to…

…to go to bed, actually. When I’m sick.

Update: The wool scour is staying open!


12
Feb 08

Pretty is as pretty does

The good news: Lotta Jansdotter’s Simple Sewing really is pretty. I’ve made two projects out of it already. The bad news? I’m getting really shitty about books that emphasise the style(ing) over the substance. I’m two for two in terms of pretty pictures that don’t accurately depict the project.

Example? The tool roll calls for twill tape to encase two raw edges—and the one in the picture very obviously doesn’t use twill tape for this at all.

I didn’t notice this until after I’d struggled and fought with Hulda to make her stitch through—please don’t laugh at me here—three layers of folded twill tape and two layers of fabric when that’s clearly not possible without some kind of massive industrial sewing machine with a needle like a BHP drill.

OK, go ahead, laugh. But the instructions told me to!

Maybe it’s because I’m a knitter, or a (former) publisher, or because I’m a crap sewer—but I’m thrown when a picture doesn’t match the pattern. I looked around a few blogs to see other versions of this project (hello, Ravelry, do you have a sewing sister?) and the sewers don’t seem bothered. One even commented: ‘I modified the pattern to use less twill tape — I mean enough is a enough, even if your name is LOTTA’.

The thing that really bothers me is that the tool roll as pictured is nice, functional and would have been very simple to write up. So where did it go wrong? Whatever. I learned how to get along, I will survive, hey hey.

Next! The chequebook cover. Very appealing, and no twill tape in sight. Just some lightweight cotton, a button, some bias tape, and a bit of elastic to hold it all together.

But again with the tape around the raw edges to encase them. I’m skittish. Do you blame me? Clearly, the instructions say to pin elastic under bias tape opposite button. I take this to mean I’m creating a functional loop. And yet, look at the picture. Do you see what I see? The loop doesn’t actually go around the chequebook cover and seems to be stitched on right next to the button. It’s pretty, but…

Maybe Lotta’s chequebook doesn’t look like mine. Maybe hers is all streamlined and Swedish and doesn’t require a working bungee cord to hold it shut because it isn’t crammed full of receipts and expired tram tickets and old lollipop sticks and shit. (OK, I admit, mine isn’t either. I don’t really even need a chequebook cover, frankly.) But still, is it too much to ask that the project photo match the instructions? That the editor might have suggested the word ‘optional’ in reference to the button and the elastic?

Harrumph. I’m going to shut up and go stitch on my bias tape now (with instructions from another source). And then, maybe I’d better move on to Francesca Denhartog’s book and see how things go there. And maybe I’d better stop expecting so much out of my how-to books. I guess pretty, inspirational pictures are supposed to be enough.